The hearing I attended was for a project for the ministry
where I work. The law allows non-profit
organizations, any non-profit organization to receive more favorable interest
rates on financing projects through the use of tax-exempt bonds. Granted this is a complicate process but for
numerous reasons many folks were opposed to a religious non-profit group getting
this kind of financing. If I disagreed I’d
go after the law however many of these folks chose to go after the organization.
One of the folks who presented against us summed it up
well. She said, “I know this is legal
but I’m asking you to do the right thing and not approve the request.” That is a contradiction in terms. If it is legal than the right thing for
elected and appointed government officials to do is to support and uphold that
law, which all but one of the officials did.
Otherwise, you have the right and privilege in our country to get those
laws changed.
If you don’t like the speed limits on the interstates do you
attack the driver who is driving the speed limit or do you try to get the speed
limit changed? You can go after the
driver but that won’t change the law.
Even after the attorney for the city presented this was a legal process approved
and supported by the US Supreme Court, many who spoke decided to go after the
organization as opposed to the law.
There are many laws on the books that I don’t like or agree
with but I’m not going after those who are playing by the rules. If I wanted to bring about change, I’d lobby
those who make the laws to change the laws. A concept that appears to be lost on many.
No comments:
Post a Comment